Ane Mintegi Del Olmo vs Lisa Zaar Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 18 Jul at 11:32 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Mintegi Del Olmo vs L. Zaar

ESP
1
Win
Played
0
Win

SWE
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Olmo 1 - 0 Zaar
They have played 2 sets in total, with Ane Mintegi Del Olmo winning 2 and Lisa Zaar winning 0. The last match between Ane Mintegi Del Olmo and Lisa Zaar was at the W35 Torino, 18-07-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Clay, with Ane Mintegi Del Olmo getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Olmo | 1 |
| Zaar | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) W35 Torino(07-18-25)
A. M. D. Olmo vs L. Zaar H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 63.69% (100-57) | Career Total W/L | 58.29% (116-83) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 4 | Titles | 2 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0.00% (0-3) |
A. M. D. Olmo vs L. Zaar Match Preview:
- When analyzing second serve success over the past six months, Zaar has a slight edge, winning 37% of points compared to Olmo's 36.42%.
- Looking at return game stats, Olmo marginally leads by winning 54.65% of opponent's second serve points, while Zaar wins 54.4%.
- For first serve return statistics, Olmo again edges out Zaar, winning 39.98% compared to Zaar’s 38.91%.
- In high-pressure scenarios, Olmo saves 47.7% of breakpoints, slightly better than Zaar's 46.47%, which is crucial for close matches.
- Over the past year, Olmo has a higher win percentage in matches, at 70.59%, compared to Zaar's 58.82%.
- Analyzing surface preference, Zaar performs best on indoor hard courts, winning 59% of matches, while Olmo excels on clay courts with a 65% win rate.
- Zaar has faced opponents with an average rank of 407.97 in the last 12 months, whereas Olmo has played against more challenging competition with an average opponent rank of 286.71.
- In deciding set situations, Olmo shows greater composure, winning 71% of these matches, while Zaar secures victory in 56% of them.
- Prospecting breakpoint opportunities, Olmo converts 43.1% into wins, surpassing Zaar's 42% conversion rate.
Editorial Prediction (July 18, 2025, UTC):
As we assess the upcoming match through various performance metrics, specific patterns emerge that advocate a competitive edge for Olmo.
Both players display similar effectiveness in recent second serve statistics, while Olmo narrowly surpasses Zaar in key return game numbers, indicating a minor advantage in exploiting opponents' weaknesses.
Additionally, Olmo exhibits superior performance in high-pressure, breakpoint scenarios. Furthermore, his track record against more highly-ranked opponents and higher win percentage over the past year bolster his position as a formidable competitor.
Although Zaar shows strengths on the indoor hard court surface, this match does not entirely favor his top-performing conditions.
Together, these factors form a comprehensive view suggesting that Olmo's balanced skill set and competitive experience will likely lead him to victory in the upcoming match.
Ane Mintegi Del Olmo vs Lisa Zaar Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. M. D. Olmo vs L. Zaar H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 8 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:59:8 | Average Match Time | 1:59:8 |
| 80% (52/65) | 1st Serve % | 73% (52/71) |
| 71% (37/52) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (30/52) |
| 15% (2/13) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (8/19) |
| 36% (4/11) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (2/4) |
| 46% (33/71) | Return Points Win % | 40% (26/65) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. M. D. Olmo Recent Matches Played
L. Zaar Recent Matches Played

A. M. D. Olmo vs L. Zaar Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63.69% (100/57) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.29% (116/83) |
| 61.08% (215/137) | Sets Win/Loss | 56.55% (259/199) |
| 55.23% (1764/1430) | Games Win/Loss | 53.31% (2237/1959) |
| 53.33% (16/14) | Hard Win/Loss | 58.93% (33/23) |
| 66.14% (84/43) | Clay Win/Loss | 57.89% (66/48) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 58.62% (17/12) |
| 0.04 | Aces Per Game | 0.01 |
| 70 | Aces Total | 29 |
| 0.32 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.36 |
| 503 | Total Double Faults | 740 |
| 1:26:23 | Average Match Time | 1:41:15 |
| 463.94 | Average Opponent Rank | 434.86 |
| 69% (5697/8252) | 1st Serve % | 73% (8603/11815) |
| 58% (3290/5697) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (4843/8603) |
| 42% (1080/2555) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (1341/3212) |
| 50% (627/1246) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (873/1705) |
| 50% (4186/8382) | Return Points Win % | 51% (5933/11741) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0.00% (0/3) |
| 64.52% (80/44) | Challenger W/L | 55.64% (74/59) |
| 62.50% (20/12) | Futures W/L | 66.67% (42/21) |
| 66% (99/150) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (115/196) |
| 52% (12/23) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (27/50) |
| 65% (30/46) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (36/63) |
| 89% (99/88) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (114/100) |
| 11% (99/11) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (114/13) |
| 22% (58/13) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (85/16) |